West Virginia Mountain Trail Runners
A Mountain State of Running
A recommendation to initiate discussion:
I have no problems with this. Most races that have indoor activities could easily move them outdoors and proceed as normal.
I agree with the removal of the stricken items.
For the item "No indoor activities for participants"... I see this being difficult at a couple events in particular because of the weather: Frozen Sasquatch and WV Trilogy. Could there be indoor activities like picking up food, or meetings if the hosting organization (Kanawha State Forest, or Experience Learning) allow it, or require participants to wear a mask indoors? Are race volunteers allowed indoors?
For the item "Strict Participation Limits"... I think we need to quantify this. All of our races already have strict participation limits because they are on State or National Forest property.
Otherwise, it is must that we maintain a mitigation plan, and this overall looks good.
@arhodes5, how about if we say, "Limited indoor activities for participants"? The masking mandate changes make requiring masking a stickier situation. Individual facilities may require masking, but I think we should have our mitigation plan to be as vague as possible and still meet safety guidelines.
Maybe we strike the "strict participation" guideline? It does seem rather unnecessary since our events, by their nature, do not have "excessive" crowds.
Updated recommendations:
More thoughts and discussion?
1. We still need a plan as long as there is still a pandemic. At the point that it is no longer labeled a pandemic, we can discuss eliminating it.
2. I'm ok with the plan as presented in Adam's last edit.
I like the last edit which gives some flexibility for indoor events.
One possible suggested edit to include:
"Until further notice, any races that meet criteria to proceed must have a COVID mitigation plan presented to the WVMTR Board of Directors that must include, but is not limited to:
- Agreement to adhere to suggested Covid 19 guidelines from local authorities.
I think that might display our willingness to go with the flow as each locality might have different rules and be flexible as things change.
Adam, thanks for the work on this. Laying it out as you've done makes it easier to get agreement and process. Great job. Thank you -
Updated recommendations:
I added in Matt's suggested addition. I agree that this adds a greater level of flexibility to the plan without necessarily going back to the drawing board to make changes.
Here's where we are in the discussion with the strikethrough text removed:
@acasseday I think "no congregating celebration/awards ceremony" is meant to be removed?
@acasseday I think "no congregating celebration/awards ceremony" is meant to be removed?
Yes, you are correct Lauren. That was a mistake.
Updated: